JUDICIAL VIEW ON EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLINGS

Abstract

This paper looks at the intricate problem of extrajudicial executions, sometimes known as "encounters," in the context of Indian law and the constitution. It examines the development of judicial reactions to such occurrences, highlighting significant rulings from the Supreme Court that have attempted to strike a balance between the defense of individual rights under Articles 14, 21, and 22 of the Constitution and state security considerations. The growth of encounter killings, the public's perception of them as tools of rapid justice, and the risks they represent to due process and the rule of law are all highlighted in the article. The function of the court, state and national human rights commissions, and law enforcement organizations in combating abuses of authority and guaranteeing accountability is examined critically. The research emphasizes the judiciary's attention on maintaining constitutional protections, fair inquiry, and trial processes through doctrinal study and case law analysis. Finally, it comes to the conclusion that, although combating crime and terrorism is crucial, the fundamental values of justice, lawfulness, and human dignity that characterize a democratic society under the rule of law must never be compromised.