EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS - A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

One of the most serious abuses of human rights, including the basic right to life, is extrajudicial executions. They allude to the intentional and illegal killing of people by state officials or their representatives without the approval of a court case or other legal procedure. Under the guise of upholding law and order, preventing crime, or guaranteeing national security, police, military personnel, or other government entities frequently carry out such activities. However, these murders undermine the credibility of democratic institutions by circumventing the concepts of justice, due process, and the rule of law.

This comparative study examines the nature, causes, and legal implications of extrajudicial killings across different legal and political systems. It explores how various countries address this issue through constitutional safeguards, criminal justice mechanisms, judicial intervention, and international human rights standards. The study also highlights the role of state accountability, abuse of power, weak law enforcement oversight, and impunity in the persistence of such practices.

This study aims to comprehend the discrepancy between the theoretical protection of human rights and their actual violation by contrasting institutional responses and legal frameworks. In order to prevent arbitrary deprivation of life, it highlights the critical need for open investigations, increased judicial oversight, police reforms, and compliance with international human rights commitments. The study's ultimate goal is to add to the larger conversation on justice, governmental accountability, and the defence of human dignity